• Skip to main content

az4ccc

Bringing Community Choice Energy to Arizona

  • CCA
  • About Us
  • Resources
  • News
  • Contact Us

Arizona needs to roundly reject Texas’ failed model of predatory electricity marketing

Arizona Corporation Commission

Feb 27 2021

Arizona needs to roundly reject Texas’ failed model of predatory electricity marketing

By Duane Ediger

No surprise $17,000 utility bills, please!

Arizonans can be grateful that Texas gave us a warning about a misguided effort in AZ to open the retail electricity market to a wide swath of deceptive practices.

A frigid February arctic wallop knocked out electric service across Texas.  But many customers whose service continued may have wished it hadn’t.

Scott Willoughby of Royce City, Texas, had a typical monthly electric bill of $200.  During the cold snap, it shot up to $16,800, which was automatically deducted from his bank account by his competitive market supplier, Griddy.  The payment eroded Willoughby’s retirement savings. (See NBC report, from 5:06)

Arizona is on the cusp of a decision that could lead to similar customer treatment here.

A currently open docket in the Arizona Corporation Commission is an attempt to follow long-expired guidance from the State Legislature.  In the late 1990s, the legislature mandated the Corporation Commission to open electric retail sales to competition before the end of 1998.  But bad experiences in other states following the same path led Arizona to drop such efforts.

The guidance was only taken up again in 2019, when a retail competition docket opened under Commissioner Justin Olson.  Olson has attempted to steer the docket on a path based on the Texas model, which has long invited shady and deceptive offers from retailers to customers. New scrutiny will undoubtedly lead to reassessment in the Lone Star state.

Arizonans would do well to closely examine Texas’ mistakes and adopt measures that are giving customers in other states the kinds of choices they really want.  Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) is leading to lower prices and cleaner air in states across our country.  CCA allows cities and towns to buy clean/green electricity in the aggregate and pass cost savings onto customers.

Not only do customers buy their electricity at a discount, they still have the option to opt out of the CCA and stay with their utility if they so choose.  So it’s a win-win.  Moreover, customers have a say in what kinds of energy CCAs purchase.  Think of a city selling energy to customers in the same way it sells garbage and water, except with choices and a say over those choices.

CCAs give customers choice while avoiding the chaos and deceptive practices that rightly gave our state pause twenty years ago.

 

Sources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UbmnTpbqr0 (5:06 – 6:19)

https://www.newsweek.com/some-texas-residents-see-electric-charges-jump-much-14k-after-winter-storm-1570742

 

 

 

Written by Shelley Gordon · Categorized: Community Choice Aggregation, Community Choice Energy, retail electric choice · Tagged: Arizona Corporation Commission, CCA, community choice energy, energy, renewable energy

Jan 26 2021

Time to Demonopolize Arizona IOUs, Make Room for Energy Choice

Vicki Sandler, Executive Director of the Arizona Independent Scheduling Administrators Association and AZ4CC Advisory Board Member, shares her thoughts on CCA, the limitations of monopoly utilities and opening up the energy market in Arizona to electric suppliers and ratepayers.

What is the problem with investor-owned utility monopolies?

Monopolies are needed if the barriers to entry are too high to support competitors entering the market. This was certainly the case over 100 years ago. Today, there are many independent power producers and when they choose the energy resources to invest in, the risk is shifted from captive ratepayers to their investors. There’s plenty of competition to build generation.  Compared to a regulated rate of return, typically these plants can be built at less cost competitively than if the monopoly builds it. Just the wires should remain as a monopoly. But today there is no incentive to compete because monopolies dominate their market.

The energy industry – and IOUs – are one of the few remaining industries that have not been deregulated.  Imagine if the airlines and telecommunications industries were still controlled by a few monopolies. Would we have the cell phone today?  Competition and choice transformed travel and communications.  We the people are accustomed to choice and choose most things that we buy and that should happen with regard to what generation we choose to purchase, be it 100% green or otherwise.  But because IOUs are a monopoly there is often little incentive to take risks such that creativity and innovation can be stifled.

What do you see as the benefits of the CCA model?

Community choice aggregation models operate through local governance where we the people, through our elected officials, get to choose what we buy, including a greener energy mix.  Today, many citizens want more green and are willing to pay for it.  The green renewable resources are often the least cost in the market also. The CCA model has been shown to be a way to achieve more clean, green energy faster and cheaper than in a regulated monopoly environment. Municipalities form the CCA and gain access to the wholesale energy market.  All decisions are local.

Another key benefit of CCA is that any profits realized are reinvested back in the community typically.  The cost of equity is lower in muni structures.

What are the benefits of the retail competition model that some of the AZ Corporation Commissioners favor?

There are 20 years of best practices on the best model of retail competition and that could be adjusted to fit Arizona’s peculiarities. Texas is the cleanest model with a free market. Prices have come down and more renewables have been added in Texas than in any other state. For the RE 100 companies that have pledged to be 100% renewable, they are economically incentivized to put facilities in the state of Texas.

There are other models nationwide such as Pennsylvania where choice works. Just like you can review a company on Yelp and decide not to go with that particular business, you can do that with your energy provider. The AZ Corporation Commission would need to adopt best practice enforcement to ensure that only high-quality players remain and if any suspicious sales tactics are used, they would pull their certificate to serve. Note that our Commission is not practically able to pull the regulated monopoly certificate because there are currently no alternative providers.

Written by Shelley Gordon · Categorized: Community Choice Aggregation, Community Choice Energy, energy industry news, industry news · Tagged: Arizona Corporation Commission, CCA, community choice energy, energy, IOU, monopoly, renewable energy, utilities

Dec 04 2020

CCAs Keep Energy Profits Local

by Duane Ediger

One of the ways CCA programs benefit their local communities is by keeping proceeds from energy purchases local.  Where Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs) commonly send those proceeds across state or national borders (for example, Tucson Electric Power customers fund a 10% return on investment to Canada-based Fortis Inc.), a CCA pours profits back into the community.

According to Lancaster (CA) City Manager Jason Caudle, Lancaster’s CCA, Lancaster Choice Energy (LCE), which was created in partnership with IOU Southern California Edison (SCE), generates $4 million in local energy revenue per year.  Caudle encouraged other southern California cities gathered for an economic outlook conference in spring 2020 to consider the CCA model.

LCE’s default service saves customers on monthly bills with  higher (35%) renewable content than under SCE.  Some customers pay a premium for the 100% renewable option.  Profits pay for energy efficiency programs, sponsorship of city events, and building up of a reserve for years when there is an energy shortfall due to unforeseen events.

Another CCA, Peninsula Clean Energy is using its surplus to install 3500 charging stations, as well as incentivizing customers to switch to electric vehicles by paying them rebates.

As city coffers throughout Arizona have taken a hard hit during the COVID pandemic, being able to keep more utility payments local will improve the resiliency of our cities and the well-being of Arizonans.

Cities and counties throughout the state will be able to strengthen their budgets once the Arizona Corporation Commission establishes a rule that makes it possible to start CCA programs, with access to wholesale energy markets.

 

Written by Shelley Gordon · Categorized: Community Choice Aggregation, Community Choice Energy, industry news · Tagged: Arizona Corporation Commission, CCA, energy, IOU, renewable energy, utilities

  • CCA
  • About Us
  • Resources
  • News
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2022 Arizonans for Community Choice